|
PIERRE CINTAS, Ph.D. (Indiana
University) |
|
CHRISTINE CLARK-EVANS, Ph.D. (Bryn
Mawr University) |
KATHRYN M. GROSSMAN, Ph.D. (Yale University) Fields: Nineteenth-century French novel; Victor Hugo studies; utopian studies; popularized versions of literary classics. I am a nineteenth-century literary scholar, with particular interests in Victor Hugo's novels and other utopian, visionary, and/or poetic prose fiction. My work has explored politics and poetics in Hugo and other post-Revolutionary writers, including George Sand, George Orwell, and Eugene Zamiatin; the appropriation of literary classics by other media; approaches to teaching language and literature; and Hugo's dialogues with other writers from William Shakespeare to Charles Dickens. My first book (Droz, 1986) focused on Hugo's elaboration of the romantic novel, in early works like Le Dernier Jour d'un condamné and Notre-Dame de Paris, as a fertile mélange des genres that reflects a poetics of harmony. My second book (SIUP, 1994) considered his prose masterwork, Les Misérables, as a completely integrated metaphorical system that demonstrates a radical new poetics of transcendence. A third book (Twayne,1996), also on Les Misérables, is aimed at a more popular audience. I am currently completing a monograph on the intricate fractal patterns in the last three novels of Hugo's maturity - Les Travailleurs de la mer, L'Homme qui rit, and Quatre-vingt-treize. In addition, I have begun a book-length study of the novelist's relations with such literary interlocutors as Sir Walter Scott, Claire de Duras, George Sand, Charles Dickens, and Émile Zola in order to show how these exchanges helped to establish popular new modes of fiction for an ever-expanding readership in the nineteenth century. Courses: Outlaws, Outcasts, and Outsiders in 19th-century French Fiction; French Romanticism and Realism; Hugo, Sand, and Company; Revolution and Utopia in the 19th-century French Novel
|
NORRIS J. LACY, Ph.D. (Indiana University) My major interests include medieval narrative (especially romance and fabliau), though I have also worked extensively on Villon's poetry and other subjects. Primarily, however, I specialize in the Arthurian legend, across periods-from the beginnings to the present-and across disciplines, from literature to painting, film, and popular culture. My first single-authored book was The Craft of Chrétien de Troyes, and I co-authored The Arthurian Handbook with Geoffrey Ashe. I served as editor of The New Arthurian Encyclopedia, of the first full translation of the Lancelot-Grail (i.e., Vulgate Cycle) and the Post-Vulgate, and of a number of other volumes, including the recent A History of Arthurian Scholarship and, with Joan Tasker Grimbert, A Companion to Chrétien de Troyes. In my studies and teaching of Arthuriana, I began by examining the structure or "architecture" of romances, and my focus gradually shifted to a consideration of the narrator's method and voice and, more recently, to the function of the numerous and nearly systematic inconsistencies and contradictions that make Arthurian subjects the fascinating creations they are. The appeal of shorter narrative (fabliaux in particular) led me to publish Reading Fabliaux and a number of related articles; my interest in these works extends from a close examination of the language and composition of texts to a study of their cultural and historical context. Recent Courses and Seminars: Paris in the Middle Ages; Medieval Comedy, Parody, and Irony; Chrétien de Troyes and Medieval Romance |
BÉNÉDICTE MONICAT, Ph.D. (University of Maryland) Fields: Nineteenth-Century Women Writers, Travel Narratives, Children's Literature, Feminist Theory My research focuses on women's writings in Nineteenth-Century France, with an emphasis on the questions that arise when examining gender through the lens of literary genres. My readings of travel narratives, children's literature, and instructional books combine literary history and genre analysis to think through patterns of gender constraints and disruptions in women's writings. Through extensive bibliographical work, I also aim to illuminate the rich creative and intellectual areas women legitimately did make theirs. This wide-ranging exploration of women's active participation in the literary and intellectual life of the nation wants to account for and provide an analysis of women's relation to creativity and knowledge production in contexts that prove critical not only to our understanding of women's writings throughout the period, but also to contemporary theoretical reflections (feminist theories more particularly). Emblematic Courses |
Heather McCoy hjm10@psu.edu |
Bénédicte Monicat bxm6@psu.edu |
Barbara E. Bullock beb2@psu.edu |